No 529 The House on the Strand by Daphne Du Maurier #DDMreadingweek
The House on the Strand would have been a surprise to me had I not recently read Du Maurier’s short story collection Don’t Look Now and Other Stories and particularly the story The Breakthrough.
Given that my only previous knowledge of her work was Rebecca, I was not expecting an entertaining slice of historical science fiction; however, having read her short stories I now know that Du Maurier cannot be pigeonholed.

Like many of the stories in Don’t Look Now, The House on the Strand concerns a man who goes on holiday only to discover a world that he could never have imagined, and whose curiosity will be his downfall.
Dick Young is a man caught, quite literally, between worlds. He is at a turning point in his life where he has to make some tough decisions about his future. He has resigned from the publishing house in London where he has been working and his American wife Vita, wants Dick and her two sons to settle in New York, where a job awaits him in his brother-in-law’s firm. Dick, it seems, doesn’t know what he wants, either in his career or in his marriage. He is not keen on the idea of moving to the States, but neither does he have a plan for what to do if he stays in England.
When Dick’s childhood friend, physicist Magnus, offers him Kilmarth, his home in Cornwall for the summer, Dick sees the break as a chance to clear his head and make some decisions while Vita and the boys are in America. However, there is a catch. Magnus has developed a new drug and in exchange for staying in the house, he wants Dick to be his guinea pig and test the drug, which appears to have the ability to transport the user back to the same area in the 14th century.
Dick tries the drug and on each ‘trip’ is witness to the lives of a group of people who lived on the land centuries before. He seems to shadow a steward called Roger and becomes immersed in a world of familial intrigue, betrayal and adultery. In particular, he becomes particularly drawn to the beautiful Lady Isolde, despite being unable to speak to, touch, or intervene in these past lives.
An eavesdropper in time my role was passive, without commitment or responsibility. I could move about in their world unwatched, knowing that whatever happened I could do nothing to prevent it – comedy, tragedy or farce – whereas in my twentieth-century existence I must take my share in shaping my own future and that of my family.
These trips to the 14th-century provide Dick with an escape – a means to ignore the stalemate in his own life and live as a mere observer, freed from any responsibility. Given his current torn state, this proves irresistible and he becomes addicted to taking trips back in time. When his wife and stepsons arrive to stay, he finds that they severely curtail his free time and ability to fall into the past, driving a greater emotional wedge between them.
Added to this, Dick is starting to realise that there could be physical repercussions to his trips – not least because it is his mind, and not his body that travels to the past, so his current body is wandering in a landscape unaware of roads, trains or cliff edges.
As a metaphor for one man’s inability to face up to the reality of his own life, the time-travel aspect of the novel is a wonderful conceit. As a local doctor, who discovers Dick after one of his trips notes,
The world we carry inside us produces answers, sometimes. A way of escape. A flight from reality. You didn’t want to live either in London or in New York. The fourteenth century made an exciting, if somewhat gruesome antidote to both
As Vita becomes concerned about Dick’s odd behaviour, the two worlds he is inhabiting start to blend, leading to confusion and strange physical symptoms. The adventure is brought to a head when Magnus announces that he is coming to visit, but mysteriously disappears on his way to Kilmarth, highlighting the danger they are toying with. However at this point, Dick is too far-gone and his obsession with life thousands of years ago has taken over, with dire consequences.
His interest was scientific, unemotional; it did not really concern him who was broken in the process so long as what he was attempting to prove was proved successfully; whereas I was already caught up in the mesh of history: the people who to him were puppets of a bygone age were alive for me.
The House on the Strand is an intricate and enjoyable book that takes a science fiction trope and uses it to examine the nature of time and the human need to find a place in the world. For me, the time travel aspects were not the most interesting aspect of the novel. In fact, despite a very realistic evocation of life in the 14th-century, I found it hard to engage with the intricate plots and numerous characters that Dick shadowed on his trips. The characters in the past feel slight, not fully fleshed out meaning that at times I found it hard to understand the pull that they had on Dick.

However, what Du Maurier does beautifully is to depict a landscape upon which the past still has an effect. She is skilled at creating a vivid setting and this is no different, only in this instance the emphasis is on how, despite the changes wrought on a landscape over the years, the fundamental core of a place remains unchanged. Houses and boundaries may disappear, but traces are left, traces we can see if we look close enough. By exploring the past of this country, Dick looks at the present anew and the interconnected nature of time and of place are emphasised.
Now, watching the express disappear round the bend in the valley, I observed the terrain from another angle, and realized how the coming of the railway over a hundred years ago must have altered the sloping fields, the line literally dug out of the hillside. There had been other disturbers of the peace besides the railway. Quarries had scarred the opposite side of the valley on the high ground where the tin and copper mines had flourished a century ago….
In some ways, Dick becomes a literal historian, travelling through the past to see what it can tell him about the present and about his future.
To me, it proved that the past was living still, that we were all participants, all witnesses. I was Roger, I was Bodrugan, I was Cain: and in being so was more truly myself
This being Du Maurier, I did not expect a happy conclusion and true to form, she shows the consequences of taking curiosity just that one step too far as Dick takes one last fateful trip after hiding the last of the drug in the head of a walking stick. If you have read the novel, the irony of the hiding place will not be lost on you and the book ends sharply in a chilling manner that will leave you yearning to know more.
I am thankful to Ali for organising this Du Maurier Reading Week. Despite owning this and a few other of her novels, I would not have rushed to pick this up and I certainly would not have had the opportunity to enjoy Du Maurier’s short stories.

I feel like I have discovered a new author and look forward to reading more of her work. You can check out the other posts from Du Maurier Reading Week at Ali’s dedicated page here.
Read on: Book
Number Read: 218
Number Remaining: 528
Cathy746books View All →
I am a 40 something book buying addict trying to reduce the backlog one book at a time!
Not knowing anythng about this novel, although why it didn’t occur to me it was set Cornwall given its author I really don’t know, I’d imagined a town house in London!
LikeLike
Ha! I know what you mean!
LikeLike
Great review Cathy. It’s apparent from your quotes that Du Maurier was as talented as sketching landscapes as she was inner lives. Her body of work seems so eclectic.
LikeLike
Doesn’t it Michael? I really don’t know what to expect now when I open one of her books. Which is a great position to be in!
LikeLiked by 1 person
An interesting and well argued review — many thanks for the read. When I first read the book some decades ago I had reservations about it — it was okay, but not up there with Rebecca or My Cousin Rachel or Jamaica Inn or The Parasites or The Scapegoat. (Definitely better than Rule Britannia, though!) I reread it more recently, though, and revised my opinion considerably upward. I really must reread Rule Britannia and see if I find the same effect!
I’ve never quite been able to face Hungry Hill, though I suppose I ought to try it one day.
LikeLike
I have SO much of her work to catch up on. Jamaica Inn next I think.
LikeLike
I think I responded to this in a very similar way to you – struggled a bit to engage with the historical sections. But I loved all the stuff in the modern day, and she always depicts place so well.
LikeLike
I think I responded to this in a very similar way to you – struggled a bit to engage with the historical sections. But I loved all the stuff in the modern day, and she always depicts place so well.
LikeLike
That’s it exactly Simon. Overall I really enjoyed it but found the historical sections hard to follow at times
LikeLike
Great review! I read this one earlier this year and agree wholeheartedly with your assessment. The way du Maurier evokes setting is phenomenal.
LikeLike
Isn’t it? In the past and the present.
LikeLike
I think Du Maurier’s sense of place is extraordinary, her portrait of Cornwall in this one is beautiful. The historical characters are perhaps less defined because Dick is unable to interact with them. Glad you enjoyed this one overall.
LikeLike
Yes Ali, I actually wondered if that was Du Maurier’s intention – to keep them as sketches because we can only know what Dick sees. I enjoyed this very much. Thanks for hosting!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not a Du Maurier I’d ever heard of before Ali’s event started this week. I’m not sure that it’s for me, but I do admire this author’s range and imagination. The sense of place sounds particularly strong, complete with striking imagery.
LikeLike
She really does seem to have been able to turn her hand to a real range of genres.
LikeLike
I read this one back in my teens, and if I’d been able to find my copy I would have loved to revisit it this week…. I remember loving it, but I really want to see how different my response is to it now! 😀
LikeLike
That would be so interesting Karen!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think du Maurier’s body of work is much more varied than people often realise. This is one of my favourites, so I’m glad you enjoyed it!
LikeLike
I have certainly been surprised and impressed by what I’ve read so far.
LikeLike
I’m not really one for time travel reads, but this does sound appealing because as you say, she’s using it to dramatise what she wants to say more broadly. Great review Cathy!
LikeLike
That’s it exactly!
LikeLiked by 1 person
We read this in our second Summer School as part of a trio that all worked in two time periods. It is a remarkably rich vein of literature and the Du Maurier is one of the best examples.
LikeLike
It really was excellent.
LikeLike
I am not a big fan of time travel plots since the whole concept is so improbable, yet the idea of being a shadow observer makes sense. This book especially showcases the talent of Du Maurier. I might have to reread it since I forgot the ending!
LikeLike
I know what you mean – like the best sci-fi this is as much about the human condition as the concept, which is why I enjoyed it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This does sound fascinating and not what one would expect at all from DDM. I think my husband would actually enjoy this one.
LikeLike
It’s great Liz. I’ve got to the point where I don’t know what to expect from DDM!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds interesting – I haven’t read any of the more Sci-fi DDM things, more the Gothic and “classic” novels.
LikeLike
She seems to have been comfortable in any genre!
LikeLike
Cathy, I loved this one – in fact it made it onto my top 10 reads of 2018! I have also loved Rebecca and My Cousin Rachel, and really enjoyed Jamaica Inn and Frenchman’s Creek too.
LikeLike
I’ve still so many of her novels to read, which is great!
LikeLike
I read this years ago and reading your post has made me want to pick it up and read it again! Great review x
LikeLiked by 1 person