No 496 Invisible by Paul Auster (for Paul Auster Reading Week)
I’ve long been a fan of Paul Auster’s work – since I was blown away by the New York Trilogy which I read – too many years ago – at university.
For some unknown reason, I haven’t read any of his recent work so I was delighted to see the brilliant Annabel at Annabookbel introduce Paul Auster Reading Week, which gave me the impetus I needed to pick up Invisible, which has been languishing in the 746 for quite a few years!

Auster is a writer whose work features very recognisable tropes – a detached male narrator who bears a strong resemblance to Auster himself, meta narratives that play with the idea of voice and lots of intertextual gameplay. As such, I think his novels, while always interesting, can have varying degrees of success. Thankfully Invisible is an example of when he gets it spot on.
It is 1967 and Adam Walker is a literature student at Columbia – an aspiring poet, whose pressing concerns are money and the draft. His family life is complicated since the accidental drowning of his younger brother and he is incredibly close to his sister, Gwyn. At a party in Manhattan, he meets Rudolf Born, a French visiting professor who, along with his girlfriend Margot, takes a liking to Adam and proposes he finance a literary magazine that Adam can edit.
This bizarre windfall seems like the answer to all Adam’s problems, but Born is a contradictory character, prone to anger and unpredictability and when Adam engages in an affair with Margot, that anger has dire consequences. One evening, while walking home Born stabs a would-be mugger in front of Adam.

The novel turns on this one moment of violence, which sees Born flee to Paris to evade the authorities and Adam muse on his own culpability in the attack and its aftermath. Adam then decides to go to Paris to study, but at the back of his mind is an ill-conceived plan to exact revenge on his nemesis.
The story of Adam and Born, and subsequently of Adam and his sister Gwyn is told in four parts, all with different narrative structures and different narrative voices. Part One turns out to be a first draft of a novel Adam is writing in the first person. Part Two shifts to a second person voice, while Part Three is told by an old university friend of Adam’s who agrees to piece together his work now that Adam is dying of leukemia. The final part takes the form of a minor character’s diary and brings the story of Rudolf Born to an interesting and unexpected emotional conclusion.
Put something in the wrong place, and even though it is still there—quite possibly smack under your nose—it can vanish for the rest of time.
The differing narrative structures create that wonderful sense of unknowing and intrigue that is always present in Auster’s work. Is Adam a reliable narrator, or is this a work of fiction rather than memoir? Was Born guilty of murder, thus justifying Adam’s obsessive quest for moral justice? In addition, just how moral is Adam himself? Adam’s relationship with his sister Gwyn sits at the heart of the novel and raises questions of memory, fantasy and interpretation.
Rudolf Born is a fascinating character, who looms over the narrative and drives the plot on in a need to uncover the truth of what happened that night in New York. The plot is propelled by a growing sense of menace and by depicting the scaffolding of his storytelling structure – with all its layering and distancing – Auster reminds us that we can never know the truth of someone else’s life, no matter how closely involved in it we are.
Invisible is Auster at his best, featuring as it does deft characterisation, an intriguing plot and a clever narrative structure that remains both open-ended and perfectly satisfying.
Read on: Book
Number Read: 251
Number Remaining: 495
Cathy746books View All →
I am a 40 something book buying addict trying to reduce the backlog one book at a time!
Although I read Invisible when it first came out, and loved it then, I’ve forgotten so much about it, so it was a pleasure to revisit it in your excellent review. It’s amazing that Auster continues to revisit the same themes and tell different stories in different styles. I must re-read this one. Thank you for taking part.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree. It’s so very Auster, but it is still completely unique and that’s what I think he does so well. I really want to reread the New York Trilogy although I also have 4,3,2,1 to get through!
LikeLiked by 1 person
4-3-2-1 is superb, and although long is easily chunkable due to the structure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love Paul Auster as well, and I’ve had Invisible on my shelves for a few years now. Maybe this is the time to pick it up because it sounds really good 🙂 After not liking The Book of Illusions, I became a bit disillusioned (ha) with Auster’s work, but this has me excited to read his books again. The New York Trilogy will always be one of my favourite books ever!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I haven’t read The Book of Illusions yet, but I really enjoyed this one. He is a superb writer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fab review, Cathy! I hadn’t heard of this one, but what with the different perspectives and formats I think it’ll be right up my street. I enjoyed the use of the second person in Winter Journal, and the books within books in various of his works.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love the way he structures his novels – always interesting and questioning.
LikeLike
Being from Brooklyn Auster’s novels are very familiar… he takes the everyday and twists and turns them as only he can. 4321 is the epic of all his efforts combined, truly masterful.
LikeLike
I have 4,3,2,1 and am really keen to read it. I need to make the time!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s well worth the time investment
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for introducing me to Paul Auster. I love stories with complicated characters in tense relationships. I think I would enjoy reading this. Hope you are doing well, Cathy – one more book off your shelf 😉
LikeLike
Thank you! Hope you enjoy Auster if you end up reading his work x
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t think I’ve ever come across this Auster before, but it does sound very compelling. It can be hard to pull off something like this given the various sections and narrative voices, but in this instance the overall approach appears to accentuate the intrigue and ambiguity. Great review!
LikeLike
Thanks Jacqui, I enjoyed it very much.
LikeLike