No 491 Dracula by Bram Stoker #readingirelandmonth20

“Welcome to my house! Come freely. Go safely. And leave something of the happiness you bring!”

For over 100 years, Count Dracula’s welcome has been gratefully accepted into our cultural imagination. Although not the first vampire story in literature, there is no doubt that Bram Stoker’s 1897 novel is the one that has had the most impact. All of today’s vampire iterations owe something to the dark count in one way or another.


Narrated through a series of diary entries and letters from an array of characters. Dracula is the story of a young lawyer, Jonathan Harker, who is sent to Transylvania to manage the affairs of a mysterious Romanian count, only to find himself held prisoner by a force of evil that will threaten all he holds dear. As Dracula makes his way to London, Jonathan, his wife Mina and his friends, including the inscrutable Van Helsing, must risk everything to save themselves, and their way of life from Dracula’s monstrous whims.

Dracula is not the book I imagined it to be, probably because years of vampire lore have raised my expectations. For one thing, it is not particularly frightening to a modern reader. The opening scenes, where Jonathan is prisoner in Dracula’s castle contain a delicious sense of oppression and Dracula’s journey on a boat to England is as grotesque as it gets.

However, once Dracula has made his way onto English soil and the fight against him begins in earnest, the book loses steam and my interest waned as I waded through pages and pages of earnest conversation told from different perspectives.

The epistolary nature of the narrative does work very well as it leaves Dracula, the main source of terror, as a void at the centre of the story. The reader never meets him directly, we only hear about him and that means that despite being the constant focus of everyone’s attention, he remains a dark shadow, a shape to be filled out by the reader’s own sense of fear.

Dracula is a book of its time and should be read as such. Stoker melds folklore, myth, science and psychiatry in such a way that directly reflects the age in which he was living. Issues of sexuality, the nature of origin and religious purity hint at the wider social concerns of the time and like Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Dracula is a deeper work than its source material would suggest.

That is not to say I particularly enjoyed Dracula. It read like a book of two halves for me, with the pace becoming turgid and heavy-handed during the final pages, before a somewhat rushed and convenient ending. While I enjoyed the scenes with asylum inmate Renfield, a lot of the time I just did not care for these characters.

Not that my reservations really matter. I cannot imagine what Bram Stoker would have made of the afterlife of his most famous creation. In just the last few months, there has been a new BBC adaptation of Dracula, the hilarious vampire spoof What We Do in the Shadows and a vampire-related episode of Inside No 9.

Dracula is no longer just a story, but a myth and we will undoubtedly be welcoming him across the threshold for a long time to come.


Read on: iBook

Number Read: 256

Number Remaining: 490

PicMonkey Image copy




Ireland Month Irish Literature The 746

Cathy746books View All →

I am a 40 something book buying addict trying to reduce the backlog one book at a time!

18 Comments Leave a comment

  1. Interesting that it’s not that scary now. We’ve all become immunised to the gothic perhaps. Although they aren’t immunised in Whitby – there’s an annual gothic festival, Dracula tours, vampire shops, maybe even bat flavoured ice cream (!) who knows. I remember it being very cold!


  2. I read this during my MA course — we studied it mostly from a book history perspective, remarking on the different formats it used and how that was influenced by the journalism of the time. I do remember it being a pretty gripping read, too, though, or perhaps that was just compared to the other stuff we read (like Trollope) 🙂


  3. I’ve never read it (or any of the other vampire stuff… but I do know that there are serious academics who study why people like to ‘scare themselves witless’ on screen or with books. If I remember correctly, it has to do with the idea that if you end up laughing at how silly it is, or yawning because it’s boring, or switching because it’s completely unrealistic, then you end up not being scared of it and that puts to bed all your nameless other fears.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. It’s a long time since I read Dracula but I seem to remember having much the same response – loved the castle and the journey, got rather bored with all the stuff once they arrived in England. Personally I think Carmilla by Le Fanu is far superior as a story and also at least as influential in terms of the sensuality theme in later vampire fiction. Plus it was earlier, so clearly influenced Stoker himself. Plus it’s short… 😀


  5. My experience mirrored yours. I thought the scariest scene was in the castle when Jonathan is in the room with those vampire women. The London sections were just ridiculous; all those people chasing around as if in a farce. And Van Helsing irritated the hell out of me …


  6. Interesting perspective! I read Dracula long ago in high school and remember finding it quite scary but your thoughts make me wonder if it would read the same to me now.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

The Book Decoder

Book Reviews By A Geek

Look Into Our Life

Our adventure through life and homeschooling in the UK

My Book Joy

Joy in reading and life


Books reviews with the occasional interview thrown in for good measure

Anne Is Reading

Books, books and more books

Lady Book Dragon

Books, reviews and more...

Fran McBookface

Blethering all things books

%d bloggers like this: