No 462 The Children of Men by PD James
What happens when real life catches up with dystopian fiction?
The Children of Men is set in 2021 – yes, just one year from now – where the world has been blighted with mass infertility. No child has been born in 25 years, despite mandated fertility testing. The youngest generation are called the ‘Omegas’ – prized for their youth and given luxurious lifestyles – but they are spoiled and violent and care only for themselves.
As Omegas aren’t expected to work, immigrants from poorer countries are brought in to England to do manual work, then sent back to their countries when they turn 60. The old and infirm, particularly the poor old and infirm, are considered a burden, and rather than being cared for in their final years, are encouraged to commit suicide in unnerving mass drownings called The Quietus. The country is run by the Warden and his State Police and criminals are sent to an isolated penal colony on the Isle of Man, famous for violence, intimidation and disappearances.
The Children of Men is written, in part, through diary entries of Theo Faron, a fifty-year-old Oxford professor who also happens to be the cousin of the Warden of England and was once in his inner circle. One day he is approached by a young woman named Julian who wants him to meet her group – the Five Fishes – and then speak to the Warden on their behalf asking for an end to the human rights abuses and the restoration of a democratic government.
They have approached Theo because of his family connection to the Warden and at first he seems like the least likely person to help such a subversive organisation. A divorced historian, he is self-regarding, centred on his own comfort and surprisingly unaffected by the fact that he was the accidental killer of his own child.
His involvement with the group grows when he witnesses the horror of a Quietus for himself, begins to develop feelings for Julian and finally realises that Julian is pregnant and therefore the miraculous future of the whole human race.
It was easier for him to kneel, so he knelt, unselfconsciously, not thinking of it as a gesture of homage but knowing he should be on his knees. He placed his right arm round her waist and pressed his ear against her stomach. He couldn’t hear the beating heart, but he could hear and feel the movements of the child, feel its life. He was swept by a tide of emotion which rose, buffeted and engulfed him in a turbulent surge of awe, excitement and terror, then receded, leaving him spent and weak.
The Children of Men, despite its end-of-the-world scenario and dramatic events, is a slow burn of a novel which didn’t totally work for me. Theo is a particularly unlikeable character – a trait I have no problem with in and of itself – but his conversion from self-centred middle-class elite to romantic saviour of mankind never fully convinced me.
What I did enjoy was how James powerfully imagined a world where there are no children and no babies, and where youth is only a remembered state. The small details create a devastating scenario; dolls pushed around in prams, recordings of boy’s choirs played in college chapels, christenings for kittens and the resurgence in popularity of Australian soap Neighbours, because of its depiction of simple, sun kissed youth.
At one time it wasn’t possible to walk down the High Street without being encumbered by their prams, by groups of admiring quasi-mothers. He seemed to remember that there had even been pseudo-births and that broken dolls were buried with ceremony in consecrated ground.
These substitute satisfactions are meagre yet sustaining and vividly depict this aging world and emphasise just what has been lost.
The best dystopian fiction, for me, needs to be believable, and that is what James does well here. The book deals subtly with a wide range of themes; aging, immigration and social justice, but for me the actual plot just wasn’t as compelling as the world in which it was set. The pacing can, at times, be slow and I never engaged with Theo enough to really care about what was going to happen.
James does well though, to give the book an ambiguous ending. There is an offer of hope, but also a creeping sense that, regardless of good intentions, nothing will change.
READ ON: BOOK
NUMBER READ: 284
NUMBER REMAINING: 462
Reading Roulette The 746 dystopian future pd james reading roulette the children of men
Cathy746books View All →
I am a 40 something book buying addict trying to reduce the backlog one book at a time!
I purchased this title many, many years ago solely because it was written by P.D. James. I was surprised at the time that it was not the crime fiction I expected. However, it is one of her most memorable novels and remains with me after all this time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do think I will remember it – the world she creates is so vivid.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I did love this book, though I agree the protagonist isn’t the most likeable. Have you seen the film, Cathy? I loved that as well, and it differs somewhat from the book. Terrifying scenario, and thought-provoking I felt, regarding things like the value of art if there’s no one to pass it on to
LikeLike
Yes! I enjoyed the film very much and I actually liked how different it was to.the book.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Such a weird, even uneven, book, but I’d like to read it again — although I may wait till after 2021 to read it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, it was strange to see a dystopian book set in the next year – although the way 202 is going I shouldn’t be all that surprised!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yikes! i salute you – I don’t think I could engage with this book right now!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds quite different to the film (which I loved). Still very intrigued by this one though!
LikeLike
It’s very different Callum, and my opinion of the book has maybe been clouded by the fact that I thought the film was fantastic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wasn’t a huge fan of the book either (though same as you, those snippets of mothers pushing dolls and animals in strollers stuck with me) but the movie is a masterpiece, if you haven’t seen it, you must. Theo is a lot better (and, you know, he’s Clive Owen, which helps)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh yes, I loved the movie and I do think it’s better. Clive Owen always helps 🤣
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wonderful review Cathy!
LikeLike
Thank you Nikki!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I never knew she wrote anything other than crime; dystopian fiction seems a big departure for her and maybe not entirely successful based on your reaction. The premise sounds chilling but the execution clearly leaves a lot to be desired.
LikeLike
She creates an amazing world Karen – sinister yet believable.
LikeLike
The movie of this was so good but so disturbing, I don’t think I could read the book. Great review, though!
LikeLike
I think I may have preferred the movie – they are very different!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, well… I’ll watch anything with Clive Owen, but hey, that’s just me!
LikeLiked by 1 person
No children sounds more like a utopia than a dystopia, surely… 😉 Pity it didn’t quite work because it’s an interesting premise, and not altogether unlikely to happen.
LikeLike
That’s what I liked about it FF – it was a believale scenario of what might happen if himan fertility started to dwindle.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d forgotten all about this one but that cover is so familiar from my bookselling days. I often wondered whether James’ many crime fans were disapointed when they started reading it. Some of it seems almost prescient giving our ageing society.
LikeLike
It has some really dramatic moments, but is actually quite a sedate book. I have to say though that she has created one of the most convincing dystopian worlds I’ve ever read.
LikeLike
This is a very even-handed review, Cathy, giving praise where its due, but I agree it’s a bit sedate in places. A flawed portrait of a dystopian society but no less disturbing for that.
LikeLike
A lot of the imagery from the book has really stayed with me – the scene of the Quietus is particularly chilling – so maybe I’ve been a bit hard on it. I just never felt completely immersed in the action.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I saw the movie first (which I loved) but I did enjoy the book. Not as much, but still worth the read. I agree, she built an absolutely chilling world.
LikeLike
Same here. I enjoyed the film more, but it’s probably unfair to compare them as they go in such different directions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Is this the source novel for Cuaron’s film, the one with Clive Owen and Julianne Moore? I wasn’t ware that it had been based on something by P.D. James, a writer I associate with crime rather than dystopian fiction. Sorry to hear you found it a bit underwhelming…
LikeLike
*wasn’t aware, rather…
LikeLike
It is indeed, but the film opens the world out more and it much more fast paced. I enjoyed the movie more I think, but they are very different.
LikeLike
Great review! I read this years ago, right after the movie came out and I watched that first. It’s strange to realize it’s set so soon in the future.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Isn’t it? Time is passing so fast
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t think I could read this now! I did enjoy the film though, and I’d totally forgotten it was based on a PD James novel.
LikeLike
The film was really great. Very different though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I started to watch the film on Netflix a couple of months ago, but stopped myself because I wanted to read it first and thought I might order the book. Amazingly, I then found the book itself in the tiny selection of English books at my local secondhand shop; it was obviously meant to be. And now I know it’s set in 2021, I shall save it until then. Incidentally, Japan recently decided to fund IVF due to their drastically falling birth rate…
LikeLike
It is a really interesting read and I think you are right to read first then watch the movie as they are so very different.
LikeLiked by 1 person